The Handmaid's Tale |
by Margaret Atwood |
Discussion Questions |
1. The novel begins with three epigraphs. What are their functions? 2. In Gilead, women are categorized as wives, handmaids, Marthas, or Aunts, but Moira refuses to fit into a niche. Offred says she was like an elevator with open sides who made them dizzy, she was their fantasy. Trace Moira's role throughout the tale to determine what she symbolizes. 3. Aunt Lydia, Janine, and Offred's mother also represent more than themselves. What do each of their characters connote? What do the style and color of their clothes symbolize? 4. At one level, The Handmaid's Tale is about the writing process. Atwood cleverly weaves this sub-plot into a major focus with remarks by Offred such as "Context is all," and "I've filled it out for her...," "I made that up," and "I wish this story were different." Does Offred's habit of talking about the process of storytelling make it easier or more difficult for you to suspend disbelief? 5. A palimpsest is a medieval parchment that scribes attempted to scrape clean and use again, though they were unable to obliterate all traces of the original. How does the new republic of Gilead's social order often resemble a palimpsest? 6. The commander in the novel says you can't cheat nature. How do characters find ways to follow their natural instinct? 7. Why is the Bible under lock and key in Gilead? 8. Babies are referred to as "a keeper," "unbabies," "shredders." What other real or fictional worlds do these terms suggest? 9. Atwood's title brings to mind titles from Chaucer's The Canterbury Tales. Why might Atwood have wanted you to make that connection? 10. What do you feel the historical notes at the book's end add to the reading of this novel? What does the book's last line mean to you? Discussion questions by the publisher
Book Club Talking Points:
Because this book deals with repression on so many levels it will provoke lots of discussion. Although overall it's not realistic, fragments ring true. I think it would be interesting to contrast some of the restrictive customs of the Islamic cultures to the situations in this book. The book also provokes thought on feminist issues, the fallout of nuclear war and the human condition - what people are capable of doing. Some think the book is the ideal male world gone askew – it would be interesting to toss this topic around. |
|